One of the fundamental tenets of effective central banking is independence from meddling politicians. While in most countries, a nominated head of the central bank must be given confirmed by the national legislature, it is generally regarded as detrimental for the government to be meddling in the decision making process of the central bank. That being said, high-level political oversight of central bank operations is a necessity.
After yesterday's shock and awe announcement from Europe's leadership which includes: 60B euros in government bond purchases by the ECB; 440B euros in loans or guarantees; as well as potentially 250B euros from the IMF (read America), I have yet to read any reaction to the apparent loss of ECB independence from Europe's politicians. Just last Thursday, Trichet stated unequivocally in a Q&A period that ECB purchases of government bonds had not been discussed at the most recent rate decision. Then in a complete 180 on the issue, on Sunday evening the ECB announced that they will be buying government bonds (along with the reintroduction of a number of liquidity facilities).
Admittedly, market volatility was very high Thursday and Friday, and the liquidity facilities existed during the earlier financial crisis. That being said, I am having an awfully hard time believing that the ECB did a complete 180 on the topic of QE over the course of one and a half trading days without enormous pressure from Euro zone politicians. If my convictions turn out to be rooted in fact, such overt political meddling does not bode well for the future of effective central banking.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment